Indexing Conformance
100.0% 0 Metadata Errors
Validated against NLM JATS v1.3 & Crossref
Manuscript Consistency
100% Zero Drift
Word, XML, and PDF stay perfectly aligned
Turnaround Speed
Instant Camera-Ready
Immediate publication-ready proofs
Production Reliability
Verified Archival Standard
Embedded fonts & vector math equations
Input Asset: Microsoft Word (.docx) Structure Model

Single-Source Publishing Architecture for Academic Journal Typesetting

Muhammad Khoiruzzadittaqwa1, Alex Chen2

1 Department of Applied Document Engineering, Jakarta, Indonesia
2 Laboratory of Computational Publishing, Cambridge, UK

Abstract: Multi-format publishing workflows frequently suffer from source drift when Word, XML, HTML, and PDF representations are processed independently. This study proposes a deterministic single-source architecture utilizing JATS XML v1.3 as the canonical foundation. Automated schema validation ensures zero structural errors, while deterministic layout compilers produce press-ready PDF and responsive HTML outputs. Experimental results demonstrate a 94.2% reduction in proof-correction discrepancies and sub-second compilation latencies on low-power hardware.

Keywords: JATS XML, Academic Typesetting, Single-Source Publishing, Typst, Document Engineering

1. Introduction

Academic journals demand stringent compliance across diverse distribution media. While online repositories mandate structured JATS XML for Crossref indexing and PubMed Central ingestion [1], print distributions require high-resolution PDF documents adhering to millimeter-accurate grid layouts [2]. Traditional desktop publishing workflows treat these formats as independent conversion targets, causing late editorial revisions in the PDF to quietly diverge from the archived XML data.

2. Methodology

Our proposed pipeline anchors JATS XML v1.3 as the single source of truth. As shown in Equation (1), the document validation fidelity score V(d) is formulated as the joint probability of schema conformance and cross-format token parity:

V(d) = P(schema_valid) × ∏k=1N (1 − δ(tokenk))      (1)

3. Experimental Results

We evaluated the pipeline across three benchmark corpora comprising 150 academic manuscripts. Table 1 outlines the comparative performance between traditional decoupled workflows and our single-source engine.

Workflow Pipeline Schema Compliance (%) Compilation Time (s) Source Drift Rate (%)
Decoupled Manual 82.4% 1,420.0s 14.8%
Scripted Pandoc-Only 91.2% 14.5s 6.2%
JATS SSOT + Typst (Ours) 100.0% 0.42s 0.0%
Target Schema: NLM/NCBI Journal Archiving & Interchange Tag Suite (JATS) v1.3 DTD Validated ยท 0 Errors
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1-3.dtd"> <article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <front> <journal-meta> <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">IJADE</journal-id> <journal-title-group> <journal-title>International Journal of Applied Document Engineering</journal-title> </journal-title-group> <issn pub-type="epub">2986-1234</issn> </journal-meta> <article-meta> <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1000/182</article-id> <title-group> <article-title>Single-Source Publishing Architecture for Academic Journal Typesetting</article-title> </title-group> <contrib-group> <contrib contrib-type="author"> <name><surname>Khoiruzzadittaqwa</surname><given-names>Muhammad</given-names></name> <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref> </contrib> </contrib-group> <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label>Department of Applied Document Engineering, Jakarta, Indonesia</aff> <abstract> <p>Multi-format publishing workflows frequently suffer from source drift when Word, XML, HTML, and PDF representations are processed independently. This study proposes a deterministic single-source architecture utilizing JATS XML v1.3 as the canonical foundation.</p> </abstract> <kwd-group> <kwd>JATS XML</kwd> <kwd>Academic Typesetting</kwd> <kwd>Typst</kwd> </kwd-group> </article-meta> </front> <body> <sec id="sec-intro"> <title>1. Introduction</title> <p>Academic journals demand stringent compliance across diverse distribution media <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">[1]</xref>.</p> </sec> <sec id="sec-method"> <title>2. Methodology</title> <disp-formula id="eq1"> <label>(1)</label> <mml:math display="block"> <mml:mrow><mml:mi>V(d)</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>P(valid)</mml:mi></mml:mrow> </mml:math> </disp-formula> </sec> </body> <back> <ref-list> <ref id="ref1"> <element-citation publication-type="standard"> <source>Journal Archiving and Interchange Tag Suite (JATS) v1.3</source> <year>2021</year> </element-citation> </ref> </ref-list> </back> </article>
Typst 0.15 Output: ISO A4 Grid (20mm Margins, Vector Fonts Embedded) Press-Ready PDF/A Compliant
International Journal of Applied Document Engineering Vol. 14, No. 2, 2026 | DOI: 10.1000/182
Single-Source Publishing Architecture for Academic Journal Typesetting
Muhammad Khoiruzzadittaqwa1, Alex Chen2
1 Department of Applied Document Engineering, Jakarta, Indonesia
2 Laboratory of Computational Publishing, Cambridge, UK
ABSTRACT: Multi-format publishing workflows frequently suffer from source drift when Word, XML, HTML, and PDF representations are processed independently. This study proposes a deterministic single-source architecture utilizing JATS XML v1.3 as the canonical foundation. Automated schema validation ensures zero structural errors, while deterministic layout compilers produce press-ready PDF and responsive HTML outputs. Experimental results demonstrate a 94.2% reduction in proof-correction discrepancies and sub-second compilation latencies on low-power hardware.
Keywords: JATS XML, Academic Typesetting, Single-Source Publishing, Typst, Document Engineering

1. Introduction

Academic journals demand stringent compliance across diverse distribution media. While online repositories mandate structured JATS XML for Crossref indexing and PubMed Central ingestion [1], print distributions require high-resolution PDF documents adhering to millimeter-accurate grid layouts [2]. Traditional desktop publishing workflows treat these formats as independent conversion targets, causing late editorial revisions in the PDF to quietly diverge from the archived XML data.

2. Methodology

Our proposed pipeline anchors JATS XML v1.3 as the single source of truth. As shown in Equation (1), the document validation fidelity score V(d) is formulated as the joint probability of schema conformance and cross-format token parity:

V(d) = P("schema"_"valid") · ∏k=1N (1 − δ("token"k)) (1)

3. Experimental Results

We evaluated the pipeline across three benchmark corpora comprising 150 academic manuscripts. Table 1 outlines the comparative performance between traditional decoupled workflows and our single-source engine.

Pipeline Schema Speed Drift
Manual 82.4% 1,420s 14.8%
Pandoc 91.2% 14.5s 6.2%
Ours (Typst) 100.0% 0.42s 0.0%

4. Discussion

The experimental findings confirm that enforcing a single canonical XML schema eliminates typographical divergence [3]. Furthermore, the low memory footprint (<30 MB RAM) allows execution on constrained client workstations without cloud reliance.

5. References

[1] NCBI, "JATS v1.3 Specification," 2021.

[2] E. R. Tufte, "The Visual Display of Quantitative Information," 2001.

[3] M. Zadit and P. Prisma, "Multi-Target Document Compilation," 2025.

HTML5 Semantic Web View with Anchored Inter-Document Cross References Mobile & Desktop Responsive
International Journal of Applied Document Engineering DOI: 10.1000/182

Single-Source Publishing Architecture for Academic Journal Typesetting

Muhammad Khoiruzzadittaqwa1, Alex Chen2
1 Department of Applied Document Engineering, Jakarta, Indonesia
2 Laboratory of Computational Publishing, Cambridge, UK

Abstract

Multi-format publishing workflows frequently suffer from source drift when Word, XML, HTML, and PDF representations are processed independently. This study proposes a deterministic single-source architecture utilizing JATS XML v1.3 as the canonical foundation. Automated schema validation ensures zero structural errors, while deterministic layout compilers produce press-ready PDF and responsive HTML outputs.

1. Introduction

Academic journals demand stringent compliance across diverse distribution media. While online repositories mandate structured JATS XML for Crossref indexing and PubMed Central ingestion [1], print distributions require high-resolution PDF documents adhering to millimeter-accurate grid layouts [2].

References

  1. NCBI, "Journal Archiving and Interchange Tag Suite (JATS) Version 1.3," 2021.
  2. E. R. Tufte, "The Visual Display of Quantitative Information," Graphics Press, 2001.
  3. M. Zadit and P. Prisma, "Deterministic Multi-Target Document Compilation," 2025.
JATS XML Schema Gate
Well-Formed XML Syntax PASSED (lxml)
Root Element Conformance <article> v1.3
DTD/XSD Schema Compliance 0 Errors / 0 Warnings
Citation Cross-Reference IDs 100% Resolved
Press PDF Geometry & Fonts
Page Size & Margins ISO A4 (20mm Grid)
Embedded Vector Fonts 5 Fonts (Times, Arial, CM)
Rasterized Text Check 0% Rasterized (100% Vector)
Orphan & Widow Suppression Enforced via Typst
Automated Preflight Status: 100% VERIFIED

All deliverables conform strictly to international academic publishing standards with zero cross-format drift.